Humanoid Robots Come Home: NEO, Figure 03 and the Price of a Robot Butler

For a decade, the humanoid robot story played out in warehouses and pilot factories, safely away from daily life. In 2026 the industry is aiming at a much harder target: the front door. Norwegian-American company 1X Technologies has opened orders for NEO, a soft-bodied humanoid marketed as the first consumer home robot, priced at 20,000 dollars or a 499 dollar monthly subscription. First deliveries are promised to homes in the United States this year. Its Californian rival Figure put its Figure 03 humanoid into real houses for alpha testing and is targeting limited home deployments by late 2026.

What a home robot can really do

The demo reels are seductive: robots loading dishwashers, folding towels, carrying laundry baskets, tidying a living room. Figure 03 was reportedly redesigned around domestic life, with padded limbs, wireless charging and tactile fingertips said to detect pressure as light as three grams, all driven by Helix, the company's vision-language-action model. 1X, for its part, wrapped NEO in soft textile and tendon-driven joints so that a stumble is an apology rather than an accident. The honest reading of the early coverage is more modest: chores are mastered one by one, execution is slow, and the list of tasks that work reliably is far shorter than the launch videos suggest.

The most important detail sits in the fine print. When NEO meets a chore it has not yet learned, the owner can schedule a session in which a 1X teleoperator takes control remotely, sees through the robot's cameras and guides it through the task. The robot learns, and so does the company. 1X says privacy is engineered in: no-go zones, scheduled sessions, blurred faces, masked audio and background-checked operators, as reported by The Robot Report and eWeek.

Early buyers are the training set

That fine print reveals the real business model of this first generation. Early adopters are not simply buying a robot butler; they are volunteering their homes as training grounds for general-purpose autonomy. Every guided session becomes data, and data is precisely what home robotics lacks. Whether that trade feels visionary or invasive will shape adoption faster than any spec sheet.

The home remains the hardest environment robotics has ever targeted: cluttered, unpredictable, full of stairs, pets and children. Nobody should expect this year's robots to run a household; think of them as a live-in beta programme. But if the loop of deployment, teleoperation and learning works, the home robot could become the biggest consumer product since the smartphone. The race to prove it has now, quite literally, moved in.